See llms.txt for all machine-readable content.

Back to schedule

Choosing the Right Workflows to Maximize ROI

Plenty of agentic workflows work. Far fewer can be proven to work in terms the business recognizes. That gap is what stalls automation programs after the first wave: the results are real, but nobody set up the measurement to show it, so the next round of investment never gets approved.

We'll share the AI value radar: a six-step framework for choosing opportunities that are set up from the start to demonstrate their value, scored across safety, feasibility, financial impact, and clear ownership. You'll see how to pick workflows where the baseline is knowable and the outcome is attributable, and how to measure them in a way that lands with a CFO rather than only with the team that built them.

Technology is only the visible tip of the transformation. Ownership, operating model, and how you define success decide whether the rest of the value can be seen at all.

Takeaway

  • Prioritize agentic workflows for provability, not just feasibility: know the baseline before you build
  • Apply a six-step value radar scored across safety, feasibility, financial impact, and named ownership
  • Measure in terms the business already uses, so results land with finance and not only with the build team
  • Understand why freeing up people's time no longer counts, and why real value usually needs both structural cost reduction and better output quality
  • Spot the workflows that look promising on paper but can never be attributed to a business outcome
Grab your ticket